Equinox Health Club Not Liable for Attack on Loud-Mouthed Spinner
- 2 Comment
New York County Supreme Court Justice Carol R. Edmead has issued a decision in the case of the spin class goofball who wouldn’t shut up when asked and got his just reward. You may remember reading about this incident back in August of 2007. Plaintiff and another patron were in the same spin class in an Upper East Side Equinox, and could not get along. Plaintiff was purportedly exceedingly vocal about his enjoyment of the exercise, which the patron found disturbing. Ultimately, that patron walked over to plaintiff’s spin bicycle, picked it up (with plaintiff still seated on it) and smashed it through the sheetrock wall.
Plaintiff sued Equinox, claiming it was negligent in failing to stop the altercation before it became violent, and in failing to remove the patron from the class prior to his initiation of the violence, but after he had demonstrated his violent propensities. In response to the defendant’s motion to dismiss, the Court found that Equinox had no notice of such an incident, in that there had been no such behavior exhibited by the same patron or anyone else. Moreover, the Court noted that “a third party’s cursing or verbal tirades are not sufficient to put a premises owner on notice of a possible physical assault.”
Plaintiff additionally claimed that Equinox negliegently failed to call the police after the altercation. The Court found that there was no legal duty to do so, and that even if there had been, defendant’s failure to do so was not proximately related to plaintiff’s injuries. Finally, plaintiff claimed that Eqinox had engaged in negligent hiring, resulting in the failure to stop the incident before it turned violent. The Court was similarly dismissive of this theory, noting that recovery on such a theory requires proof that the employer was on notice of the tortious propensities of the wrongdoing employee, which was not established here.
The motion by Equinox to dismiss was granted in its entirety.
2 Comments on this post
Trackbacks
-
throckmorton said:
These are the lawsuits that just seem to sum up the problems with out tort system. One person does something to another. The “Tort solution” is to sue who has the biggest pockets. In this case the health club as opposed to the person who actually did the wrong deed.
I can only imagine that if the club has removed the offender that they would have also been sued because of discrimination. (“I was discriminated because of my pschiatric diagnosis of anti-social behavior!”)
How much did it cost the health club in this case to be vindicated? Who ended up paying the bill?
January 9th, 2009 at 6:14 am -
Andrew Barovick said:
I don’t know what the cost was, but it was probably covered by the club’s insurance carrier, who likely provided the lawyer who defended the club. But this case has “cost” everybody in other ways. The patron who tossed the vocal spinner and allegedly injured him was charged with criminal assault afterwards, and the case actually went to trial here in Manhattan. The defendant-patron was acquitted of all charges. But the trial took about a week, and took up valuable time, and taxpayer dollars. Seems kind of silly to me.
January 9th, 2009 at 1:40 pm
