<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NEWS TO END THE WEEK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thenewyorkmedicalmalpracticelawblog.com/2009/01/news-to-end-the-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thenewyorkmedicalmalpracticelawblog.com/2009/01/news-to-end-the-week/</link>
	<description>An overview of New York medical malpractice, products liability and personal injury law, and the news that affects it</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 18:34:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Barovick</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewyorkmedicalmalpracticelawblog.com/2009/01/news-to-end-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Barovick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 20:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenewyorkmedicalmalpracticelawblog.com/?p=125#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Regarding your comment about the NEJM, see the comment made by Supremacy Claus under &quot;Recent Comments.&quot;  Your opinion is a bit more restrained than his (or hers).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding your comment about the NEJM, see the comment made by Supremacy Claus under &#8220;Recent Comments.&#8221;  Your opinion is a bit more restrained than his (or hers).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: throckmorton</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewyorkmedicalmalpracticelawblog.com/2009/01/news-to-end-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>throckmorton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenewyorkmedicalmalpracticelawblog.com/?p=125#comment-110</guid>
		<description>Oh, I forgot.  With its &quot;tort reforms&quot; Texas has seen a huge surge in physicans moving into or back to the state.  Many of these physicians are moving from Oklahoma.  Also, many patients from Oklahoma are choosing to go to Texas as well as the choice of physicians is better and there are high risk OBs, neurosurgeons etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I forgot.  With its &#8220;tort reforms&#8221; Texas has seen a huge surge in physicans moving into or back to the state.  Many of these physicians are moving from Oklahoma.  Also, many patients from Oklahoma are choosing to go to Texas as well as the choice of physicians is better and there are high risk OBs, neurosurgeons etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: throckmorton</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewyorkmedicalmalpracticelawblog.com/2009/01/news-to-end-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>throckmorton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenewyorkmedicalmalpracticelawblog.com/?p=125#comment-109</guid>
		<description>The New England Journal of Medicine seems to be the preeminent medical journal only for those that are not in medicine.  In fact, I cant find a single physician in our area that actually gets the thing.  We rely on the peer reviewed journals in our specialty journals which carry the real weight of medicine.  The NEJM is more of an opinion piece of the Massachusetts Medical Society but seems to be the prefered medical journal for reporters and attorneys.

It tends to be very political, opinionated and lacking in statistical significance.  It is not supprising that they are now choosing to release conflict of interest information, they only problem is that they should have been doing it for years as have the &quot;real preeminent medical journals&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New England Journal of Medicine seems to be the preeminent medical journal only for those that are not in medicine.  In fact, I cant find a single physician in our area that actually gets the thing.  We rely on the peer reviewed journals in our specialty journals which carry the real weight of medicine.  The NEJM is more of an opinion piece of the Massachusetts Medical Society but seems to be the prefered medical journal for reporters and attorneys.</p>
<p>It tends to be very political, opinionated and lacking in statistical significance.  It is not supprising that they are now choosing to release conflict of interest information, they only problem is that they should have been doing it for years as have the &#8220;real preeminent medical journals&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

